IN DEVELOPMENT   /   Explore the guides and calculator today.Join the waitlist
For CPAs / 401(k) profit sharing

When a client asks, “How much can I put into profit sharing?”

Turn the tax-planning question into a retirement-plan design comparison: owner target, employee funding, allocation method and the testing that still has to be completed.

EDUCATIONAL TOOLS TODAY / CASE-SPECIFIC DESIGN WORKFLOW IN DEVELOPMENT

The handoff should stay simple
The clientDefines the owner goal and acceptable employer budget
↓
The CPAFrames the tax-planning question and compensation facts
↓
NewComparability.comTranslates the objective into plan-design scenarios and testing questions

FOCUSED RESOURCE / NOT A REPLACEMENT FOR THE CLIENT’S TPA, RECORDKEEPER OR TAX ADVISOR

The question behind the question

“How much can I contribute?” is usually two separate questions.

First: how much contribution room does the owner have? Second: what employer funding is required for the rest of the plan if the owner wants to reach a specific target?

Individual limit

How much room does the owner have?

Employee deferrals, safe harbor contributions, matching contributions and other annual additions can already be using part of the owner’s limit.

See the owner-contribution framework
Plan design

What does the owner target cost the business?

A pro rata formula and a New Comparability allocation can produce very different employee funding for the same owner contribution objective.

Compare profit-sharing allocation methods
A planning example

Keep the owner target constant. Compare the employer cost.

Assume one owner earns $300,000 and wants a $45,000 employer contribution. Three eligible employees earn $150,000 in total.

Same owner target. Different allocation question.Illustrative

EMPLOYER PROFIT-SHARING DOLLARS / NOT A COMPLETED COMPLIANCE TEST

IllustrationOwnerEmployeesTotal employer funding
Pro rata at 15%$45,000$22,500$67,500
New Comparability illustration$45,000$7,500$52,500
The second row assumes a 5% employee allocation for illustration only. A real case requires the full census, plan document and nondiscrimination analysis.
What to collect before the design conversation

Five facts make the handoff materially better.

  • Owner objective: the actual employer-contribution target, not automatically the statutory maximum.
  • Employee census: age, eligible compensation and the full population that may affect testing.
  • Ownership and family relationships: enough detail to identify HCE and related-business issues that may change the analysis.
  • Existing employer contributions: safe harbor, match or other nonelective amounts already funded or expected.
  • Plan document: the current allocation provisions and any restrictions the provider is administering.
Useful now

Answer the client’s first question without pretending the preliminary math is the final answer.

A dedicated profit-sharing design workflow is in development.

Join the waitlist as a CPA for early-access updates. No client census or personal data is requested through the waitlist.

Join the CPA waitlist